As the road to WrestleMania winds down, the WWE has made a bold move that has left fans and insiders alike scratching their heads. The decision to run over its own product, both literally and metaphorically, raises a host of questions about the company's strategy and its relationship with its performers. Personally, I think this move is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it's a bold statement that the WWE is willing to take risks and shake things up. On the other hand, it's a risky move that could backfire if not handled carefully. What makes this particularly fascinating is the timing. With public criticism mounting from performers like Roman Reigns, Tiffany Stratton, and LA Knight, the WWE is essentially turning the spotlight on itself. This could be a strategic move to regain control of the narrative, but it also raises the stakes for the company. If the WWE can't handle the heat, it could burn itself. The segment featuring Pat McAfee's surprise return and attack on Cody Rhodes is a prime example of this. By aligning with Randy Orton and calling the product 'absolute shit', McAfee has essentially thrown down the gauntlet. What many people don't realize is that this move could be a turning point for the WWE. It's a bold statement that the company is willing to confront its own flaws and shortcomings. However, it also risks alienating fans and performers who have been loyal to the WWE for years. The decision to run over its own product also raises questions about the WWE's creative direction. The feud between Roman Reigns and CM Punk, for instance, has been criticized for its psychological tactics and questionable booking decisions. If you take a step back and think about it, the WWE has a history of creating compelling storylines and characters. However, in recent years, there has been a noticeable decline in the quality of its programming. This raises a deeper question: is the WWE losing its touch? The decision to make its stars and product look flawed also has implications for the company's relationship with its performers. Cody Rhodes, for instance, has been vocal about the decision to cut back on house shows. In my opinion, this move could be a missed opportunity for the WWE to build camaraderie and keep its wrestlers sharp. The card for this year's WrestleMania is also worth noting. With 12 matches across two nights, the WWE has a lot on its plate. However, the decision to keep performers in the dark about which night they'll compete is unfair to both the performers and fans. This raises a question about the WWE's organization and planning. Despite all this, the WWE is still expecting a big crowd in Vegas. What this really suggests is that the company believes in the power of WrestleMania to draw fans in. However, the exorbitant ticket prices and the decision to run over its own product could potentially backfire. The question remains: can the WWE handle the heat of its own making? As the road to WrestleMania winds down, the WWE has set the stage for a dramatic and unpredictable event. Whether it's a triumph or a disaster, one thing is certain: the WWE has thrown down the gauntlet and is willing to take risks. Now, it's up to the fans and performers to see if they can handle the heat.
